Of course, your home might not be worth the same as those folks, or maybe you couldn't afford that amount of initial negative cash flow (averaging about $2,000 annually for the first five years [without considering the tax benefit of the deductibility of the mortgage interest]) - so you might be able to only afford a $50,000 equity take-out. In that instance, everything would simply be divided by four, but otherwise the example would remain the same.
On the other hand, you also might be starting out younger, and that allows much more time for everything to build up by retirement age.
Later we'll look at the specific companies I used in this current example.
JW
A celebration of the stock market by Jay Walker, author of The Brink's Truck Burst Open on Wall Street! A Holistic Approach to Finding The Easy Money In Common Stocks. Facts and ideas on how to outperform the general market, portfolio management and risk, with a growing focus on how climate change should affect your investment strategy. All wrapped nicely with a value-oriented investing bias.
Sunday, February 19, 2006
Leverage Edition: $3.01 - Do what you CAN afford
Financial leverage continued ....
50 year old couple, limited savings, poor retirement prospects, so did equity take-out of $200,000 from their house, additional loan payments of $1,199 monthly, intend to invest in dividend paying "Widow and Orphans" stocks, which have a small negative cash-flow for a few years, but is expected to become cash-flow positive in the sixth year and by their 70th birthday, is anticipated to be providing around $28,728 annually in positive cash flow.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment